![]() ![]() ![]() Lower cost back to 125 manpower and 35 fuel (from 150 manpower and 45 fuel essentially undoing the March 6th nerf) They need to be made into a more regular line infantry and I think this would be the way to do it. We can see this play out in how DAK players attempt to just not use PzGrens by either going like 4 Panzer Pioneers or another unit like Bersaglieri. A Panzer Pioneer with a flamethrower or Assault Grenadiers both do much better as a CQC unit and this leave PzGrens lacking a purpose. PzGrens I believe currently have an identity crisis where they are the mainline infantry of the DAK that are intended to be an aggressive in your face unit yet they are easily outclassed at close range by other options. Modify the Kar 98s to perform better at mid range while being weaker at long range still (essentially remove their shotgun nature in favor of a more traditional line infantry) There are cool ideas here but I have come to believe that certain design decisions have caused strange balance changes in an attempt to not make them an issue. ![]() I want to take this post to talk about a couple things related to the DAK and some issues I think exist within the faction. I had been working on this for a couple days now and then the March 6th patch has brought a wide sweep of nerfs to most of the core parts of the DAK. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |